下面小编给大家整理的GRE写作防雷同判定经验技巧，本文共8篇，欢迎阅读!本文原稿由网友“还我漂漂拳”提供。
篇1：GRE写作防雷同判定经验技巧
在语言上可以使用一些范文的句式，但是绝对不能照抄原文，而是要换掉一些关键词。或者如果要借用关键词，则必须使用别的句式。
在结构上可以采取声东击西的策略，比如把一篇高分范文的结构和破题策略用在另一道类似的题目上。
篇2：GRE写作防雷同判定经验技巧
在例证方面，使用范文用过的例证没有问题，哪怕用那些被判雷同的例证也没问题。例证是人类的共同知识，谁都可以使用，关键是我们不能用和范文作者同样的思路和语言来诠释例证并展开类似的论证。
因此，越是耳熟能详的例证如牛顿与苹果树、爱迪生孵蛋，要写出原创的内容就越困难，雷同的危险就越大。
GRE考前一周应该如何准备GRE写作
关于GRE的写作部分，很多同学都定位不清，而且市面上流行的说法非常多。比如有的说要写长句，要写难句，甚至有人说要押韵。对这些说法姑且不做评论。今天万炜老师在这里只分享的考试前最后一周GRE写作该怎么做。
万炜老师教GRE写作的时候有一项明确规定：上课认真听讲，下课不复习，考前一周甚至考前3天再开始准备写作。之所以这么要求，是因为中国考生的GRE Verbal都还来不及复习，甚至数学准备都不充分，所以不建议将宝贵的复习时间用于写作。
事实上，申请中只有极少数专业对GRE写作成绩有要求。这一点几乎适用于所有理工科院系、教育学、MPA、艺术类、与数学有密切联系的社会科学专业(如经济学)。即便你申请哈佛耶鲁，也是如此。只有如英语文学、新闻这一类纯文科专业GRE写作才有可能要求4分甚至更高。因此，尽管万炜老师对大家GRE Verbal的要求是精益求精，对GRE写作则不然。
本文介绍的短期突破方法主要针对写作目标分数在3到5分的选手。而那些GRE写作考了2.5分的同学，你可能根本不知道GRE写作在考你什么。
根据最近两年ETS发布的数据来看，中国考生GRE写作的平均成绩为3.0分。这个分数并不算高分，但对大部分考生来说足够申请使用。事实上，当你的托福写作分数达到20分以后，GRE写作基本可以随意考到3分。但是需要注意的是，GRE写作考的不是写作，而是你的分析能力。
考生语言水平要求：TOEFL写作分数大于20分，那么GRE可以随意考3分。GRE写作考的不是写作，是你的分析能力。
这里和大家分享万炜老师独家整理的GRE写作argument和issue的题目分析。此处需要注意的是，因为argument短期内更容易有所突破，所以建议各位考生更加重视argument。
对于Argument的复习要求是，看完上述资料的所有分析，写至少三篇文章，字数400，三篇文章形式必须一样。也就是三篇长得非常像。Argument必须保证每篇文章写得差不多。
对于Issue的复习要求是，看完所有分析，写每篇文章的框架(开头，各段段首理由)。
考前一周GRE写作的参考模板
13、University should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study.
正方：
1、任何学科都不是孤立的，可能受到其他学科的影响，所以学其他科本身就可以辅助自身学科学习。证据，如艺术与科学。
2、在一个人长期的发展中，最终成为行业领头人时，很多看似不想管的学科都可能成为重要的影响。证据，如担任管理者。
3、很多人在大学时并不能确定自己人生的方向，接触更多可以多了解一些。证据，学生的专业选择。
反方：
1、没时间。反面证据。
2、没兴趣。反面证据。
结论：完全赞同。
虽然最终结论是完全赞同原观点，但因为考虑到了正反两方的意见所以充满了批判性，所谓的critical thinking。
正文中可以借鉴的表达：
1 to begin with 理由1
2 furthermore 理由2
3 in addition 理由3
4 however people may...
Issue的标准结构：
陈述话题
正方的理由及我的相应看法
反方的理由及我的相应看法
因此，同学们短期练习Issue可以根据万炜老师提供的资料，思考每一篇文章的框架。
GRE写作
篇3：GRE写作如何避免雷同判定
GRE写作如何避免雷同判定?掌握这4点就能合理借鉴好文章
一、观点要鲜明更要有自己特色
观点是GRE作文考试的核心内容，考察考生能否对一个issue进行深入分析与思考并最终提出一个有层次的观点。有了原创观点就不用担心雷同。我这样说也许有有点像让快饿死的人去吃肉粥。如果真的要借鉴范文观点，我建议应该尽可能做一些调整，以避免第二个雷区。或者干脆在文中讲明这个思路是借鉴了哪一本参考书的。美国人对真小人比对伪君子要宽容。
二、照抄原文格杀勿论
在语言上可以使用一些范文的句式，但是绝对不能照抄原文，而是要换掉一些关键词。或者如果要借用关键词，则必须使用别的句式。
三、结构要区别开来
比如把北美范文用在120题的结构和破题策略用在210题上。
四、合理引用例证
在例证方面，使用范文用过的例证没有问题，哪怕用那些被判雷同的例证也没问题。例证是人类的共同知识，谁都可以使用，关键是我们不能用和范文作者同样的思路和语言来诠释例证并展开类似的论证。
因此，越是耳熟能详的例证如牛顿与苹果树、爱迪生孵蛋，要写出原创的内容就越困难，雷同的危险就越大。
看的出来，要想避免雷同我们还是要靠自己去写作，而不能一味地参照别人的文章。所以我们在平时的写作练习中也要锻炼自己的原创能力。
GRE写作题目分类练习：教育
1. A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
2. While some leaders in government， sports， industry， and other areas attribute their success to a well-developed sense of competition， a society can better prepare its young people for leadership by instilling in them a sense of cooperation.
3. In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level， all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
4. Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student‘s field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.
5. Colleges and universities should offer more courses on popular music， film， advertising， and television because contemporary culture has much greater relevance for students than do arts and literature of the past.
6. It is primarily through formal education that a culture tries to perpetuate the ideas it favors and discredit the ideas it fears.
7. Some educational systems emphasize the development of students‘ capacity for reasoning and logical thinking， but students would benefit more from an education that also taught them to explore their own emotions.
8. It is often asserted that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. In reality， however， formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.
9. How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately， we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society.
10. Both parents and communities must be involved in the local schools. Education is too important to leave solely to a group of professional educators.
11. The purpose of education should be to provide students with a value system， a standard， a set of ideas-not to prepare them for a specific job.
12. Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Othervise， these talents are likely to remain undeveloped.
13. Although innovations such as video， computers， and the internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students， these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
GRE写作的常用词汇内容
一系列:
a series of; in a row;
好像、可能：
likely; possible; probably; perhaps; as though; maybe; may; might;
解决方案：
solution; approach; recipe; scheme
方面：
angles; aspect; facet; side; viewpoint;
in all respects; in many fields;
highlight an aspect of;
in all likelihood;
获得：
acquire; gain; attain; achieve; pursue;
影响;
interfere with~;
have/exert a profound influence on life/personality;
have a dramatic/undesirable effect on;
满足：
meet; satisfy; accommodate the demand of; be accustomed to;
很明显的：
it is conceivable/ obvious/ apparent;
conspicuous; strikingly; notably;
类比：
apply specifically/equally to;
GRE写作逻辑思路的锻炼
TOEFL作文考：“吃饭是在家里吃好，还是到饭店里吃好”; GMAT考和商业有关的：“产品制造出来是延续时间很长的好，还是延续时间不太长的好”;GRE作文：“在我们这个社会中间，现在专业人士太多了，而有综合知识的人太少了。你认为我们是更需要具有专业知识的人呢，还是需要具有广博知识的人?”
TOEFL考生活、学习;GRE 考日常学术行为。但是不管它出什么题目，总是会摆出两种态度供你选择。另外，GRE的作文题目是提前发给你的，考试时出的题目绝不会超出它事先发给你的题目。它决不会出让学生看不懂的题目。所出的题目永远是世界性的，不涉及民族、宗教、政治色彩。
考察了普林斯顿所出的全部范文后发现，美国人百分之七八十喜欢倾向于一种模式。讨论在哪里吃的问题时，要不在家里吃，要不在饭店吃，但是你不要又想在家里，又想在饭店(A OR B)。当然他们也比较认可中间的态度(C)，也就是说，我既要A又要B，我是A和B结合起来产生C。事实上，好多中国学生结合A、B写是能写出好分数的。当然也有些题目是没有C这种态度的。
C态度这种写法和A、B的写法，在段落结构上是有差异的。我先讲两种文章的段落结构。
如果是采取A或B的写法，段落结构是比较简单的。通常分为三个层次，第一个层次是第一段。说明我要采取A还是B。第二个层次可以不只一段，说明为什么选择A/B是对的。为什么要有三段呢。因为必须至少有2个理由，至多3个理由。美国人认为一个理由是不够的，4个理由绝对太多。他们最喜欢 2到3个理由。最后一段就是结尾，讨论B的缺点和部分优点，同时坚决强调你要选择A。
C模式：它有两大难点。1。你要表明A和B 的必不可少性，所以你的段落就会很长;2第二段就要写A的好处、缺陷都在哪;3要写B的好处和缺点;4 要证明只有把A和B结合起来才能弘扬两者的优点，避免缺点。这样的文章是最合情合理的，优点是非常的reasonable。缺点是这种文章的长度比我们前面说到的第一种类型的文章，至少要长出1/3。而你写的越长就越容易犯句子语法和结构，以及拼写的错误。所以如果你的写作水平很一般的话，就不要用这种
写法。但是如果你的写作水平很高的话，我建议你用这种写法。尤其是碰到一些我认为只有把两者结合起来才能写好的题目时。所以GRE作文难就难在它的题目比较难。这种题目有两种写作方法，这两种方法都是能拿6分的。
逻辑思维能力的第二步就是怎么写好中间这部分。开头挺好写的，好多同学直接照着题目抄，这大可不必，也挺愚蠢的。GRE作文题目也是可以抄的，但是你最好还是自己写。千篇 一律只有几种开头的方法：1。说大话开头法：开头就是一个宏伟的概括;2。幽默一点的开头法。3。从自我经历写起。
下面我们来具体讲一下中间应该怎么写。
首先来讲一下，写这三个理由要避免的几点：
.避免观点重复;不要讲了几遍其实都是一个理由。当你一点就能说明的时候，非要讲三遍就显的有点STUPID了。你要从多个方面来讲道理，而且要尽量把问题具体化。
.避免观点的庸俗化，并考虑美国人能否接受的问题。比如说要避免对任何宗教词批判太多。因为你永远搞不懂给你判分的是信什么教的。不能批判任何政治理想。不能贬低自己所在的国家。美国人最讨厌不爱自己国家的人。避免观点的庸俗化，就是我们说的有些东西可以想，但是不能写出来GRE作文逻辑思路分为两种。一种是问题发挥型，一种是argument/争论型。
对于问题发挥型题目，你怎么发挥，怎么犯逻辑错误都没有问题，只要你能保证你观点的正确，并能用具体的事实证明你的观点。而对于 argument/争论 型题目就不同了。它的出题方式是给你一段话，这段话后再给出一个总结。然后让你挑出它的逻辑错误。需要你作的是.它的结论或者对其加以补充。你只要拿出三点理由把它.就行了。这三点理由从哪里找呢，从文章里面找，从文章
下面举一个例子：现在有一种计算机仪表设备，把它安在商用飞机上之后就必然能避免飞机在空中的碰撞。因为一架飞机发出碰撞信号后，另一架飞机就能接收这个信号并及时采取行动，从而避免飞机碰撞。
这里结论就是飞机必然能避免碰撞。你要做的就是.这个结论。它的因果关系是因为安装了仪表所以能够避免碰撞。你要说的是安装了仪表不一定能避免碰撞。现在你就要找出3点理由来。
1. 文章中没有任何统计数据告诉我们飞机的碰撞百分之百是商用飞机，因此如果避免碰撞，就要在所有飞行物上安装这种仪表。
2. 安装了仪表后，是否需要人来操作。如果是，那么因为有人的原因，就不能避免碰撞。
3. 要是这个仪表系统坏了。
4. 也没有谈到气候问题，卫星干扰问题等干扰因素……
所以Argument文章不需要你有文采，也不需要你有多么好的句子结构，它只是要求你的逻辑没有漏洞。
GRE写作范文积累：实用的意义
题目：
Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.
正文：
In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.
Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.
This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.
Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.
To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.
篇4：GRE写作使用防止雷同技巧
GRE写作判定越来越严格 使用模板防止雷同技巧分享
新GRE写作模板使用策略1
拿到新GRE作文的模板以后，要做的第一件事情就是确定文章的主体框架结构，第一时间定位引出观点和总结观点的词汇以及句式，从而确定这篇写作模板的水平，进一步评估其参考使用价值。
新GRE写作模板使用策略2
新GRE写作模板要看的最主要的地方就是它的论证结构，需要做到能够确定论证过程的框架，比如对一篇模板的每个支持段落都有各自的论证模式，举例，因果，对比等方面的分解学习，最好能精确到对于确定到论证的逻辑引导词上。
新GRE写作模板使用策略3
确认主框架结构和论证结构，评估出对于这篇模板的使用方式后，就可以开始通过改写文章模板的句子，运用自己擅长的表达方式，句型和词汇等内容对结构框架进行替换变更，将这篇模板改造成自己习惯的模样。
新GRE写作模板使用策略4
整体改变完成后，可以对句式做一下小调整和改变，将各类语法结构加入其中，比如：倒装，独立主格结构，虚拟语气等。当然这个步骤属于锦上添花，而不是画蛇添足，所以每位考生都请根据自己的实际情况量力而行。
新GRE写作模板使用策略5
对于模板当中各段的论证方式，请按照<提出分论点><解释分论点><总结分论点/联系主观点>的方式进行整理和调整，并在每个分段的最后总结一下分论点和主观点之间的联系，保证整体论证的完整合理和逻辑通顺。
新GRE写作模板使用策略6
改写句子过程中需要特别注意不同句式的变换，尽量避免简单句的并列使用，多写一些高质量的句式，为文章增光添彩。
新GRE写作模板使用策略7
尽量减少零碎的句子，多使用比如which、where等连词把句子串联起来。
新GRE写作官方题库精选
The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times.
“Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just completed. Members of the town council already have suggested more road building to address the problem, but as well as being expensive, the new construction will surely disrupt some of our residential neighborhoods. It would be better to follow the example of the nearby city of Garville. Last year Garville implemented a policy that rewards people who share rides to work, giving them coupons for free gas. Pollution levels in Garville have dropped since the policy was implemented, and people from Garville tell me that commuting times have fallen considerably. There is no reason why a policy like Garville's shouldn't work equally well in Waymarsh.”
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
题目翻译
Waymarsh的交通问题显然正在接近纪录。仅仅三个援前我上班路上需要15分钟，现在几乎需要25分钟。Waymarsh应该借鉴我们临近城市Gearsville的例子。去年，Gearsville实施了一项政策，奖励那些合伙搭车上下班的人以免费的汽油券。政策实施之后Gearsville的污染水平下降了，一些住在Gearsville的朋友告诉我他们上班比以前要快。鉴于Waymarsh严重的交通与污染问题，我们必须实施和Gearsville类似的政策。
题目分析
论断：我们必须采取和隔壁G城一样的政策。因为我们的污染和交通问题都非常严重。三个月前我上班花15分钟，现在差不多需要25分钟。G城实施政策用免费的油票鼓励人们共用车，政策实施后G城的污染一直在下降，而几个住在那儿的朋友告诉我他们上班比以前快了。
不一定成立的前提，即我们的污染和交通问题很严重。首先论者没有提供有关我们的污染问题有哪些，情况怎样，我们无法知道他的说法是否正确。其次交于交通问题的恶化，仅凭他个人的经历不能说明整个城市的问题。因为三个月的时间还不足让整个城市的交通恶化到论者所描述的程度，也许是论者上班的道路上局部发生了一些变化，比如可能有施工等暂影响交通的因素。
G城的措施能解决我们的问题。首先两个城市的必然存在的差异使得G城的经验不一定会适合我们，比如居民密度，车辆拥有量等。如果G城居民密度大，彼此之间距离近，而我们居民之间住得远，就使得共用车无法实行。其次，用免费油票剌激居民共用车上班，有可能增加居民在其他方面多用车。
·G城解决得很好。首先论者没有为我们排除其它因素带来G城的污染下降的可能，比如G城关闭了污染严重的工厂等，这使得我们无法确信是共用车制度使汽车污染下降。其次关于交通问题，论者用的几个朋友的表述也不足信，因为各别人的经历同样无法代表整个城市的变化。
结论：论者的推论考虑不周全，仅凭个人感觉就作出武断的推论。提出的建议也不值得采纳。
提纲参考
1. 时间顺序不决定因果关系。可能是由于道路施工。污染下降可能由于环境治理。
2. 一些人的情况不说明整体情况。可能由于道路改造工程。
3. 奖励免费汽油券未必减少交通，从某种程度上鼓励开车。样本差异。
新GRE写作官方题库精选
The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company.
“Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies—Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the building constructed by Zeta cost 30 percent more to build. However, that building's expenses for maintenance last year were only half those of Alpha's. In addition, the energy consumption of the Zeta building has been lower than that of the Alpha building every year since its construction. Given these data, plus the fact that Zeta has a stable workforce with little employee turnover, we recommend using Zeta rather than Alpha for our new building project, even though Alpha's bid promises lower construction costs.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
题目翻译
以前我们公司在两个不同地区拥有两座地方办公建筑。它们由两家建筑公司--Alpha和Zeta分别建造。尽管两座建筑的平面布局基本相同，由Zeta所建造的建筑造价高出了30%，去年的维护费用是由Alpha建的楼的两倍。而且，Zeta大楼建成以来的能耗每年都比Alpha大楼要多。这些数据，再加上Alpha公司拥有稳定的员工队伍且雇员流动性很小的事实，表明我们应该使用Alpha建筑公司而不是Zeta来建造未来所有的建筑工程。
题目分析
论断：我们今后的项目应该用A而不应该用Z。因为十年前A和Z分别在两个不同的地方为我们建了两个办公楼。尽管两个楼有完全一样的地面设计，但是Z公司多花了30%，而且去年它那楼的维修费用是A楼的两倍，每年的能量消耗也比A楼高，另外A员工流失少有稳定的劳动力。
·论断前提是A比Z好，论是论者没有提供任何有关两家公司目前的规模，技术以及员工情况。
·论据没有说服力。首先，两个楼在两个不同的地房，地质条件的不同，以及建造时的气候不同都会影响到楼的造价，以及相关的费用。第二，地面设计一样不意味着两个楼一样，可能Z公司的楼更高，设计更周全。第三楼的用途和使用量直接决定了楼的维修费用和能量消耗，可能Z楼使用更多一些。
·论者用的例子是十年前的，十年的时间两家公司可能都变化挺大，当时的情况不足以说明现在，以及以后。而关于稳定的劳动力，这并不能保证A的工作效率一定高。
论断的结论武断。即使A比Z好，也不意味着都要用A。
结论：论者没有足够的证据支持自己的观点，单凭早年肤浅的资料没有说服力。论者应该进一步了解两家公司目前的状况，并根据具体的项目特征选择适合的公司。
提纲参考
1. Z所建造的可能质量好，并且当地的材料更贵。去年维修费用高可能前几年都低，应全面比较。能耗高与人和气候有关，并未必与楼有关。
2. A员工稳定不说明工作好。应该考察A、Z的全部成绩，而不只是一栋楼的情况。
新版GRE写作新题库：Argument
题目：
The following appeared on the Mozart School of Music Web site.
“The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons. First of all, the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age levels; there is no audition to attend the school. Second, the school offers instruction in nearly all musical instruments as well a wide range of styles and genres from classical to rock. Third, the faculty includes some of the most distinguished musicians in the area. Finally, many Mozart graduates have gone on to become well-known and highly paid professional musicians.”
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻译：
Mozart音乐学校显然应该是所有学音乐学生家长的第一选择。首先，Mozart学校面向所有年龄段和能力的孩子们进行招生，并且没有任何的面试。其次，学校提供几乎所有的乐器以及范围广泛的曲风和流派学习课程，从古典到摇滚。第三，学校员工包括一些本地最著名的音乐家。最后，很多Mozart的毕业生已经成为著名而且较高收入的音乐家。
写一篇回应，在其中检视文章的论证中述及和/或未明确述及的假设，务请解释文章的论证是如何依赖于这些假设的，并指出如果这些假设不成立会对文章的论证带来何种影响。
篇5：gre考试写作如何避免雷同
gre考试写作如何避免雷同
1.绝对不能照抄原文。
gre考试要在语言上可以使用一些范文的句式，但是绝对不能照抄原文，而是要换掉一些关键词。或者如果要借用关键词，则必须使用别的句式。
2.在观点上要具有洞察力，要有自己的原创特色。
观点是新gre作文考试的核心内容，考察考生能否对一个issue进行深入分析与思考并最终提出一个有层次的观点。有了原创观点就不用担心雷同。我这样说也许有有点像让快饿死的人去吃肉粥。如果真的要借鉴范文观点，我建议应该尽可能做一些调整，以避免第二个雷区。或者干脆在文中讲明这个思路是借鉴了哪一本参考书的。美国人对真小人比对伪君子要宽容。
3.可以引用范文例证。
在例证方面，使用新gre写作范文用过的例证没有问题，哪怕用那些被判雷同的例证也没问题。例证是人类的共同知识，谁都可以使用，关键是我们不能用和范文作者同样的思路和语言来诠释例证并展开类似的论证。
因此，越是耳熟能详的例证如牛顿与苹果树、爱迪生孵蛋，要写出原创的内容就越困难，雷同的危险就越大。
4.在结构上可以采取声东击西的策略。
比如把北美范文用在120题的结构和破题策略用在210题上。
GRE作文备考：搜集与美国思维相关的素材
1.GRE写作素材积累
我们要多看报纸，多看杂志和书籍，从这些素材挑选好的文章，从而使自己的文章可以得到润色。作文素材积累很重要，因为有时我们可以跳过自己写的环节直接引用他人的文章素材，这是一个节省时间的最好方法。所以注重GRE作文素材的积累是一个很有效的方法。
2.GRE写作素材评估
作文素材也有好有坏，我们要对自己的作文素材进行评估，那么这样的话就不会使自己的作文显得很没有水准。我们在看报纸或是杂志或是书籍的时候可以边看边记录，这样有用的东西都被我们记录下来，在考试的时候直接运用，取得高分。
3.GRE写作素材运用
作文素材运用也是一门学科，因为我们如何去把握素材，如何运用素材也要自己考虑，通常写作得用一到两个素材为最佳，一个太少，二个则显得太过于杂乱，好好把握素材的量是一门很必要的学科。
有意而为之，专门为了新GRE作文来准备一些相关的资料，就可以取得理想的成绩。若是想要考出一个好成绩，花费时间是一定的，没有提前准备就绪的话，其实很难达到理想效果。所以在准备新GRE写作时候，一定要认真收集GRE写作素材。
GRE写作必要掌握积累的谚语素材
1. Waste not,want not.
俭以防匮。
2. From saving comes having.
富有来自节俭。
3. A penny saved is a penny gained.
省一文是一文。
4. Take care of the pence and the pound will take care of themselves.
金钱积少便成多。
5. Frugality is an estate alone.
节俭本身就是一宗财产。
6. He that regards not a penny,will lavish a pound.
小钱不知节省，大钱将滥花。
7. Small gains bring great wealth.
积小利，成巨富。
8. Many a little makes a mickle.
积少便成多。
9. As the touchstone tries gold,so gold tries man.
试金之石可试金，正如黄金能试人。
10.Courage and resolution are the spirit and soul of virtue.
勇敢和坚决是美德的灵魂。
11.The path to glory is always rugged.
光荣之路常坎坷。
12.Nothing is difficult to the man who will try.
世上无难事，只要人肯试。
13.The fire is the test of gold;adversity of strong man.
烈火试真金，困苦炼壮士。
14.Great hopes make great man.
远大的希望造就伟大的人物。
15.No way is impossible to courage.
勇士面前无险路。
16.A smooth sea never made a skillful mariner.
平静的大海决不能造就出熟练的水手。
17.The good seaman is known in bad weather.
坏天气下才能识得出良好的海员;要识好海员，须凭坏天气。
18.The best hearts are always the bravest.
行为最勇敢的人心地总是最善良。
19.We must not lie down,and cry,God help us.
求神不如求己。
20.He that falls today may be up again tomorrow.
今天跌倒的人也许明天就会站起。
21.Rome was not built in a day.
罗马并非一日可建成;坚持必成。
22.Success belongs to the persevering.
胜利属于坚忍不拔的人。
23.We must repeat a thousand and one times that perseverance is the only road to success.
我们要多次重申：不屈不挠是取得胜利的唯一道路。
24.Perseverance is failing nineteen times and succeeding the twentieth.
十九次失败，到第二十次获得成功，这就叫坚持。
25.Step by step the ladder is ascended.
登梯需要逐级登。
26.Adversity leads to prosperity.
困苦通向昌盛。
27.Patience and application will carry us through.
忍耐和专心会使我们度过难关。
28.Fortune often rewards with interest those that have patience to wait for her.
做事只要有耐心，到头总会有好运;耐心候好运，好运常会来。
29.All things will come round to him who will but wait.
只要肯等待，一切都会按时来。
30.Constant dropping wears the stone.
滴水不绝可穿石。
篇6：GRE写作高分经验
GRE写作高分经验分享 立论驳论文提分心得不可不看
以下就是我自己总结一点小技巧：首先，我在准备GRE写作备考时，最重要的一个步骤在于熟悉题库和认真准备提纲。
GRE立论文issue经验分享
对于立论文(Issue)说，我觉得自己动手拟一份提纲是非常有用的，你可以参考各种资料，但必须勤动脑，想一想提纲的逻辑连续性。实际上，有偏向性、但又不要绝对化的思路才是最易上手的。
GRE驳论文argument怎么练?
对于驳论文(Argument)而言，我认为熟悉题库更为重要。正常情况下是这样的，但的确有些难题若不事先好好准备，五分钟之内能找出两个错误就不错了。在第一次考试时，我正是因为在准备时放掉了一道我只找出两个错误的题目，而在正式考试时恰恰碰到了这道题目，所以写得很不好。
写驳论文有很多小窍门，如需要锻炼出区别“事实”和“观点”的能力，不论题目中所给的事实有多夸张都需认为它是对的，不能攻击，只能攻击观点中的逻辑漏洞;凡是跟统计数字、统计方法有关的逻辑错误都尽量不要攻击，最多只能一笔带过等等。
GRE作文逻辑重要吗?
虽然逻辑作文满分只有6分，可千万别小看了它的重要性。从某种程度上来说，它是GRE的精华——因为GRE考的就是逻辑，用英语写两篇作文只是形式而已，主要目的就是考察你的逻辑分析水平。
怎样看待GRE作文中的语言水平?
至于GRE作文的语言，其实不是很重要，只要通顺、没有语法错误就可以了，掌握了这些就可以更好地备考GRE作文。希望可以给大家一些参考，从而更好地备考GRE阅读考试。
新GRE写作：审查的公正性
题目：
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
审查很少能够做到公正。
范文：
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while to arouse applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now, in some authoritative countries, the censorship is used to rule its people by restricting their minds, of course, for the stability of their governing over the people. With these regards, censorship itself is questioned at the rationality of existing, regardless of the practices made by the democratic government, while the justice of the democratic government is quite doubtable.
The matter concerning is not only who practices the censorship but also how it is practiced. Since different men make different comments on the same work of art, for example, it is hard to set up a measure by which we could decide whether one should be prohibited, especially to the work of arts, as its content always labeled as “subversive” and “revolutionary”, two words detested by the governors most. Such cases could be found in Ulysses by J. Joyce and Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D.H Lawrence, these two great novels were firstly considered to be guilty of obscenity and were put to prohibition by the American government, but turned out to be true masterpieces today. So any form of censorship, to some extent, lags behind the development of ideas and will put more or less a negative effect on their development.
Though the censorship is such a disgusting word embodying so much oppression and might, it is a compromise we made with the reality far from being perfect, to provide a comparative stable ground which we could stand on. At this point, I don’t agree with the institute like ACLU who oppose any censorship. The censorship, though rarely justified, should exist as long as a more ideal and practical form is found to replace it, or we could only expect our God to create a more ideal species instead of imperfect human beings.
新GRE写作：权威问题
题目：
Much of the information that people assume is ‘factual’ actually turns out to be inaccurate. Thus, any piece of information referred to as a ‘fact’ should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future.
大多数人们认为是事实的信息结果实际上都是不准确的。因此，任何据称是事实的信息都应该被质疑，因为它在将来很可能会被证明为是错误的。
范文：
Should we be doubtful to all the information at hands because the rightness of which is uncertain? The speaker claims so, I concede that people often commit various fallacies in the course of cognizing things, however I fundamentally take exception of the arguer's assertion to mistrust every fact we might encounter. And I will substantially discuss my views thereinafter.
To begin with, the speaker seems to implicate that a fact would be proven false in the future under numerous circumstance. Nevertheless I prefer to argue that facts never change. No matter how did the Medieval Church and Inquisition persecute Bruno, the fact never changes that the earth is far from being the center of the universe as the religious sovereigns had assumed or hoped for, while just a minor particle in it. Equally, no matter how Edison had tried to incite the public fear and distrust to the alternative current electricity, the fact never changes that Teals’ electrical system is vastly superior to his direct current electrical one, and would be accepted and applied in larger range.
However, what do change are the human's objective interpretations to facts. One compelling argument to this point is that, due to the limitation of human’s knowledge and comprehensive capability, they tend to make insufficient or even false understanding to the certain fact. An apt illustration is the changes of cognition to disease. While at the ancient time, our progenitors believed the a man becoming a patient for the reason that he had conduct crimes or offended some ghosts or spirits, the contemporary people have well know that the varies of pathogens are the basic causes to our diseases, and the defects of our immune system and so forth are also the factors as well. Another argument for the change of comprehension to fact is that different people always observe and interpret from different perspectives. Though the Relativity theory is not well compliable with the Quantum mechanism, no one call the greatness of both Einstein and Bohr, because their theories are based on distinct views, the former from the macrocosm and the later from the microcosm.
Notwithstanding the foregoing reasons for that human tend to make fallacies during the cause of comprehending and cognizing facts, these reasons should never be the excuses to doubt every conclusion we might draw from facts. Based on certain rational inference and proper knowledge fundament, the conclusions we make might well be justifiable, if not completely right, to certain degree. What we need to do is to promote the enterprise of pursuing the better answer and try to use the result we have get to application, instead of wasting our time to undue doubt and suspicion. Though the medical scientists have not fully understood the mechanism of how the does the implanted organ interact with the wounded body, they are not refrain from using the implanting skill to save patients, of course the precondition or which is that this technology is much well established than the fundamental theory.
To sum up, while I advocate the speaker's opinion that it is inevitable for human to comprehend facts inaccurately, for the reason of the limitation of the abilities, I essentially disagree with his assertion that facts will continually alter themselves, as well as his recommendation to discredit any piece of fact. In the final analysis, I would argue once more that facts never change and although the misunderstanding to them is inevitable, we should not defer ourselves from the pursuit to fully comprehending them.
篇7：GRE写作：满分经验
决定考G本来就是一时冲动的结果，因为对于我来说要付出巨大的时间成本，并且接受短期内得不到任何实际的收益这一事实。
然而，当我看到很多同学纷纷加入到考G行列中，自己也鼓足勇气参加了，就算是为了一个梦，为了自己的将来能有多一点的选择，能够为机会多做尝试。
备考的过程我并没有经历太多的辛酸和劳苦，我很佩服一些学院的同学要在期末顶着论文、实验、期末考试等种.种压力复习备考，我的大量时间大概和大多数人一样花在了单词上。红宝书翻过几遍已经不记得了，也翻过barron's list(但事实证明效果并不好)。
至于说技巧或者经验，在这里我也只能谈一谈我对这个考试的一点感受，希望能给其他同学一点启发。
作文：不要轻视argument
能拿满分对于我来说很意外。关于字数，当时我的情况大概是：“issue500+”，“argument600+”也许大家都在奇怪为什么我argument能写的比issue多，其实我想告诉大家不要看轻argument，不要因为它容易就倾向性的少付出努力，不要忘记评分的时候两部分的权重是一样的。
argument的模版大家应该见过很多，但在这里我想说的是既不要完全套用模版，因为这样会有雷同的危险，也不鼓励在文章结构上过分的创新，可以参考模版提供的结构。写作时不要让人感觉你是在“码字儿”，文章的思想和逻辑性永远是最重要的，也是拿高分的关键。
所以在开头和结尾的评价总结性语句中，你要注意和你在正文中的分析是否匹配，所谓匹配不在于用几个专业定性的词汇，而是要在细节上完美对应。当然把握这一点并不容易，因为涉及到用词和表达能力，在这一点上就要看你个人的水平了，词不在于华丽，而是要准确并且前后一致，并且尽量减少重复。
Issue也是一样，我一直觉得要“意在笔先”，作文最重要的是你要有话可说，这就是为什么在字数上争论没有意义了，你的观点立意一般，你又没有太多的话可说，字数自然上不去，随意的拼凑不见得能拿高分。关于issue还有一点要说，就是宁愿往深里写也不要扩大范围的泛泛而谈。我写的题目是关于英雄反映了一个社会的价值观的，整篇文章我只引用了MichaelJordan这一个例子，当然在选例子的时候也要有讲究。我看到很多人花很多时间和精力搜集素材，写文章的时候喜欢方方面面地进行列举，我不大赞同这样的做法，因为如果例子不是你熟悉的，引用起来也只能停留在浅层次，而没有深度。
语文：多做新题目
能拿到600分，完全靠的是我阅读的功底，还有一点运气，因为这次阅读相对简单。
考试当天没能够跨区对我来说损失很大，很多题目就是一念之差。所以在这里要提醒大家珍惜做新题目的新鲜感，而不要把过多的时间花在反复看已经解决好了的老题目上。这次G6的类反比并不难，既没有偏词怪词，也没有考什么特别的逻辑关系，但是从题目到题支都很少有和过去题目重复的地方。这就是为什么要大家这样做的原因。
篇8：GRE写作：满分经验
“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives.”
I disagree with the portion of the “Specialists of all kinds are highly overated” statement. Specialists are persons who take care of certain tasks or a specific area of whatever the case may be. These persons contibute more time and effort than those with general titles. the specialists are the ones who can tell or give the client more details on what is happening to them. The generalist can only give broad ideas which can be a number of things. The specialist narrows the ideas down to the specifics. For example if one goes to a “general practioner doctor” for pains in the chest area, he would tell the client that the poblem may be heart burns, or something else that's not be so serious, depending on the symptoms. He may also refer him to a cardiologist to be sure it's not any thing else. The point I'm making is that specialist are people who can help us out even more that our generalist. Also the fact that one would go to a specialist only in dire needs.
COMMENTARY
The response presents a position on the issue but the development of that position is seriously flawed. The writer begins by disagreeing with the assertion that “specialists...are highly over-rated” and then attempts to define and contrast specialists and generalists. The attempt is unsuccessful, partly because the descriptions are vague and ill-conceived.
Whereas the example of going to a “general practitioner doctor” is certainly relevant, the writer's claim that a general practitioner would tell a patient with chest pains that the problem “may be heart burns or something else that's not so serious” seems far-fetched.
The response is further weakened by poor word choice and by numerous errors in sentence structure, usage, and grammar. These problems, while not severe enough to seriously interfere with meaning, contribute to the overall rating of “2.”
- GRE阅读备考经验2023-10-26
- 专四专八写作满分经验及技巧2024-10-07
- 毕业论文写作经验2024-09-24
- GRE写作的四种方式2023-01-17
- GRE写作：具体分类2023-04-29
- GRE写作特点盘点2023-07-31
- 如何快速提高写作简历的技巧和经验？2022-04-16
- 怎样储备GRE写作素材2022-12-17
- GRE写作：短期内怎样提高2022-12-11
- GRE作文：ISSUE写作策略2023-05-26