GRE英语考试作文点评：尝试用问句开头

下面是小编整理的GRE英语考试作文点评：尝试用问句开头，本文共4篇，欢迎您阅读分享借鉴，希望对您有所帮助。本文原稿由网友“Aloysia”提供。

篇1：GRE英语考试作文点评：尝试用问句开头

GRE英语考试作文点评：尝试用问句开头

Issue 19

“Creating an appealing image has become more important in contemporary society than is the reality or truth behind that image.”

Has creating an image become more important in our society than the reality or truth behind the image? I agree that image has become a more central concern, at least where short-term business or political success is at stake (＝at risk). Nevertheless, I think that in the longer term mage ultimately yields to substance and fact.

个人认为以问句为开头是一种百用不厌的.好方式，一来吸引了阅卷者的注意，二来又容易抓住中心。

精华：a central concern

be at stake

yield to = give up the position to...让位于，被……主宰

The important role of image is particularly evident in the business world. Consider, for example, today's automobile industry. American cars are becoming essentially identical to competing Japanese cars in nearly every mechanical and structural respect, as well as in price. Thus to compete effectively auto companies must now differentiate their products largelythrough image advertising, by conjuring up(＝create) certain illusory benefits--such as machismo, status, sensibility, or fun. The increasing focus on image is also evident in the book-publishing business. Publishers are relying more and more on the power of their brands rather than the content of their books. Today mass-market books are supplanted within a year with products that are essential the same---except with fresh faces, rifles, and other promotional angles. I find quite telling the fact that today more and more book publishers are being acquired by large media companies. And the increasing importance of image is especially evident in the music industry,  where originality, artistic interpretation, and technical proficiency have yielded almost entirely to sex appeal.

这一段主要是举例说明ima

篇2：GRE英语考试作文点评：6分的构架

首先是ISSUE部分评分标准：从最高6到0分。

SCORING GUIDE FOR PRESENT YOUR PERSPECTIVE ON AN ISSUE

GRE ESSAY SCORING GUIDE: PERSPECTIVE ON AN ISSUE SCORE

6 A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue and demonstrates mastery of the elements of effective writing.

满分作文的标准：表现出对语言的把握(mastery)，对题目的深刻理解(complexities)，并且cogent。

A typical paper in this category

--develops a position（看到了吗，a position，要选取一个角度）on the issue with insightful reasons and/or persuasive examples （看到OR了吗，所以没有例子也可以，如果你可以congent并且给出非常insightful的理由）

--sustains a well-focused, well-organized discussion（关于文章结构的要求）

--expresses ideas clearly and precisely

--uses language fluently, with varied sentence structure and effective vocabulary （关于语言的要求的，你对语言的mastery就应该从这几个方面体现出来）

--demonstrates superior facility with the conventions （grammar, usage, and mechanics） of standard written English but may have minor flaws（这个minor flaws是建立在不影响理解的基础之上。）

1--Topic: Generalists vs. Specialists

Present your perspective on the issue below, using relevant reasons and/or examples to support your views.

“In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly overrated. We need more generalists -- people who can provide broad perspectives.”

SAMPLE-1 (score:6)

In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both positive and negative effects among persons in Western society call for a balance in which there are both specialists and generalists.

这一段非常干净利索的引出来题目的'theme: specialist and generalist这个就是general statement。一些朋友拿文章出来修改的时候我经常发现没有一个引子，一个general statement。缺少这个部分的文章是得不到高分的.

Specialists ar

篇3：GRE英语考试作文点评：满分作文的解析

GRE英语考试作文点评：满分作文的解析

Issue 23

“Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem.”

这个题目分析起来是说学术目的的。作为一个scholar/researcher应该考虑的是自己的感兴趣的领域所在而不是考虑是不是他们的研究成果是对整个大社会大环境有贡献的。这个题目第一眼看起来好象似乎是有理的，但是想到很多时候很多科学家的成果实际是无意义的。美国不是有一个搞笑诺贝尔奖吗？就是奖励类似的研究的。虽然也是科学成果但是根本就没有实际操作的价值或者对人类或者对社会根本就没有意义的。

但是这个contribution在某些时候也可以引申到名利方面。从这个方面来讲，这个题目是可以成立的。

对这个题目进行进一步的分析，可以看出来题目里面有一个比较，非常明显的比较，more来带出来的，所以我们可以说这个speaker的观点是很明显的表明了自己是支持哪个方面的。

Should academic scholars and researchers be free to pursue whatever avenues of inquiry and research that interest them, no matter how unusual or idiosyncratic, as the speaker asserts? Or should they strive instead to focus on those areas that are most likely to benefit society?

拿问句来起头，来质疑。脱离出了一般的解释题目的开头。虽然不是特别特别，但是还是让人感觉比较的.attractive。l strongly agree with the speaker, for three reasons.非常直白的陈述自己的观点，同意speaker的观点。

First of all,典型的连接词，开始陈述观点了。who is to decide which areas of academic inquiry are worth while?又是一个问句，但是这个问句的作用和开篇的问句不同了，是引出来自己论证的第一个方面。Scholars cannot be left to decide.自问自答。

Given a choice they will pursue their own idiosyncratic areas of interest, and it is highly unlikely that all scholars could reach a fully informed consensus as to what research areas would be most worthwhile. Nor can these decisions be left to regulators and legislators, who would bring to bear their own quirky notions about what would be worthwhile, and whose susceptibility to influence renders them untrustworthy in any event.

两个否定句非常干净利索的说出作者的看法，没人有能力来决定什么是应该worth researching的。

Secondly, by human nature we are motivated to pursue those activities in which w

篇4：GRE英语考试作文点评：文章中逻辑关系

GRE英语考试作文点评：文章中逻辑关系

Issue 24

“Such nonmainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not addressed by mainstream science.”

这个题目是讲主流和非主流的关系，提的方面是科学领域内。但是这个题目里面我自认为的一个问题是，speaker把astrology，fortune-telling，psychic，和paranormal pursuits也归结为科学的范畴内了，但这些都是我们通常成为的伪科学(pseudoscience)的几个典型方面。

这个题目，目前我没有想到什么好的方面来支持这个speaker的正确性。希望有持支持观点的朋友来说说你自己的`看法伪科学的相关释义附在点评最后处

This statement actually consists of two claims: (1) that non-mainstream areas of inquiry are vital in satisfying human needs, and (2) that these areas are therefore vital to society. I concede that astrology, fortune- telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits respond to certain basic human needs.

干净利索的分析了题目，但是个人认为还不是分析的很透彻。

However, in my view the potential harm they can inflict on their participants and on society far outweighs their psychological benefits.

自己观点出来了，反对。是一个让步的关系，先承认了是有此方面的作用，用了however来了个转折给从更大的方面给否了。

Admittedly, these non-mainstream areas of inquiry address certain human needs, which mainstream science and other areas of intellectual inquiry inherently cannot.

开始驳斥了，首先肯定了其之作用。

One such need involves our common experience as humans that we freely make our own choices and decisions in life and therefore carry some responsibility for their consequences. Faced with infinite choices, we experience uncertainty, insecurity, and confusion; and we feel remorse, regret, and guilt when in retrospect our choices turn out be poor ones. Understandably, to prevent these bad feelings many people try to shift the burden of making difficult choices and decisions to some nebulous authority outside themselves--by relying on the stars or on a stack of tarot cards for guidance.

GRE英语考试作文点评：6分的构架

GRE英语考试报名攻略

初中英语考试作文

第一次尝酒作文

尝试做灯泡作文

GRE英语考试作文点评：尝试用问句开头.doc

将本文的Word文档下载到电脑，方便收藏和打印

推荐度：

点击下载文档