以下是小编整理的三分钟即兴演讲精选，本文共5篇，欢迎阅读分享。本文原稿由网友“木木jing”提供。
篇1：三分钟即兴演讲精选
尊敬的老师、亲爱的同学们：
大家好!
在这秋高气爽的日子里，我们送走了祖_亲的x岁生日。
泱泱中华五千年，那滚滚的黄河是她澎湃的热血，催人奋进，催人向前;那生生不息的长江是她灵动的脉搏，跳跃着永不枯竭的悸动;那连绵起伏的长城是她挺拔的脊梁，屹立东方，岿然不动……无数的这些都是我们祖_亲的象征，它们记载了母亲无数的沧桑，它们是一种永不灭的精神!我不禁要大声说：中国，我为你骄傲，为你自豪!实验高中即将迎来5岁生日，虽然只有两届毕业生，年轻实验高中已向祖国的各大城市输送了千多名优秀的大学生，特别是2三分钟即兴演讲范文精选8年为中国学府——北京大学输送了一名优秀的学生。
今天，看到国旗冉冉升起，过去的岁月浮现在眼前。1949年的10月1日，伟大领袖毛主席在开国大典上庄严宣告：“中国人民从此站起来了!”它向世人昭示：告别了一个旧世界，迎来了一个新世界的中国人民，从此人人平等，当家作主，成为国家的主人;实验高中高考一炮打响，再创辉煌，使实验高中成为一所名副其实的会泽名校，20的高考6三分钟即兴演讲范文精选分人数到全市57所高(完)中第5名的佳绩。
有人说，19世纪是英国人的世纪，20世纪是美国人的世纪，而21世纪，就是我们中国人的世纪。中国经过几十年来的艰苦建设，已取得了“乘长风，破万里浪”的迅猛发展：沿海城市经济的崛起，香港澳门顺利的回归，神舟七号完美的飞天，北京奥运会上健儿们奋力地拼搏，五星红旗一次又一次冉冉地升起……祖国面貌日新月异，综合国力逐步增强，人民生活显着改善，国际地位日益提高。我们的祖国正一步一步走向强大。但，请不要忘记，我们仍然是个发展中国家，还有许许多多地方有待完善和发展，我们在座的同学们还在用我们父母会泽亲戚朋友的钱来生活和学习，也有暂时困难的同学。
亲爱的同学们，我们该做些什么呢?我们该怎样报效祖国呢?其实，就在我们身边，有无数的小事可做。
一个热爱祖国的人，同时应该是一个热爱班级、热爱学校的好学生。我们应该发扬中华民族的传统美德，学会宽容，不要为打饭时的一点口角大打出手，学会礼让，学会遵纪守法，不要为一时冲动二付出代价，学会孝敬父母长辈……我们应该多用礼貌用语，用端正的学习态度和优异的成绩汇报祖_亲。
同学们，让我们用知识加汗水，以满腔热情，拥抱新的希望，迎接这个机遇与挑战并存的21世纪吧。
最后，我用哈佛大学图书馆墙上的训言与师生共勉：
此刻打盹，你将做梦
而此刻学习，你将圆梦。
我荒废的近日，正是昨天殒身之人祈求的明白。觉得为时已晚的时候，恰恰是最早的时候。幸福或许不排名次，但成功必排名次。学习的痛苦是暂时的，未学到的痛苦是终身的，请享受无法回避的痛苦。
篇2：三分钟即兴演讲
感恩是一个美丽的话题，同学们你们感恩吗?当一个人讲话， 感恩是一个美丽的话题，同学们你们感恩吗?当一个人讲话， 用内心发出的声音是宏亮的，当一个人讲话， 用内心发出的声音是宏亮的，当一个人讲话，口是心非的时 候，说出来的话就是拖着长音的。再一次回答我，你们感恩 说出来的话就是拖着长音的。再一次回答我，
在美国， 每年的 11 月的第四个星期四是感恩节， 在那天， 无论天南地北的孩子都要赶回家， 人们要感谢父母，师长，感谢社会，感谢生活，那一天，美国家庭要举行丰盛的感恩宴，不 仅为自己，也为穷人，孤儿，流浪者们，让这些不幸的人们在感恩节里也得到一份人间的温 暖。 其实对我们来说有没有感恩节并不重要， 重要的是我们每个人是否有一颗感恩的心。 有 恩有爱，是人类生活中最灿烂，最绚丽的文明之花，滴水之恩，涌泉相报，是人类广为传诵 的美德。懂得感恩也是做人的基本条件之一，如果不会感恩，从某个角度讲，就是对人类神 圣感情的亵渎。感恩是一个美丽的话题，同学们你们感恩吗?当一个人讲话，用内心发出 感恩是一个美丽的话题，同学们你们感恩吗?当一个人讲话， 感恩是一个美丽的话题 的声音是宏亮的，当一个人讲话，口是心非的时候， 说出来的话就是拖着长音的。 的声音是宏亮的，当一个人讲话，口是心非的时候， 说出来的话就是拖着长音的。再一次 回答我，你们感恩吗? 回答我，你们感恩吗?
领舞《千手观音》的聋哑舞蹈家邰丽华，经常用手语说一句话：“我会带着一颗快 乐感恩的心去面对我的人生。”______年感动中国人物徐本禹这样说：“虽然我的行动过程是 非常苦，非常累，但是我会用我的努力，让我的学生知道，他们不比别人差，所以，我感觉 我是一个快乐的人，是一个幸福的人，我也希望每一个朋友能够做一个知道感恩的人，尽自 己的努力，去帮一帮社会上需要帮助的人。”台湾评选的第 37 届十大杰出青年赖东进先生 从小就出生在一个贫困的家庭， 他的父母都是残疾人， 只能靠乞讨来养活他。 9 岁的时候， 他 才走进学校，他一边读书，一边讨饭，一边照顾残疾的父母和弟妹，每次讨饭回来。他都要 跪着喂他的父母。当他成名以后，在一次座谈会上，他这样说：“我对生活充满了感恩的心 情，我感谢我的父母，他们虽然眼睛瞎了，但他们给了我生命，我还感谢苦难的命运，是苦 难给了我磨练。
篇3：三分钟英文即兴演讲
China is a nation with a long history of, known as the “ancient civilization”. In the vast history, Chinese culture has a long history, profound through the ages, has been with the development of the national language.
Chinese characters, is the pride of the Chinese people, it is ancestors generations of the crystallization of wisdom, is the symbol of the Chinese nation. Whenever we write down each one vivid characters, exclamation characters will be wonderful, “cross” “vertical”, “” si“... simple strokes, but formed hundreds of thousands of words.
A ”happy“ word, make we smile; A word ”angry“, then let us got miffed up with anger. A ”cry“ word, let us shade; A word ”music“, and making us laugh... In the face of the rich and colorful words in our country, but now the young people and how to do?
Fashion, tide, this is the pursuit of our primary and middle school students. Had appeared in our country, using traditional Chinese characters, write Mars, this is the text of serious damage to our country. Our words to through the vicissitudes of life, more than 600 years of Chinese characters: from the original oracle, pictographic, later again to the modernization of traditional Chinese characters, to perfect modern simplified characters. Don't we should go to learn our country general words?
”Pole wide long bench, pole want to tie on the bench, the bench doesn't let carrying-pole tied to the bench...“ Ah, good intelligent Chinese, good beautiful Chinese. The charm of Chinese is really big, ”learning Chinese all over the world,“ when singing this a few words of lyrics, the in the mind is very proud, when we are empathetic listening to this beautiful Chinese, more profound understanding to the many people are talking about the ”English“.
篇4：英语即兴三分钟演讲
every one of us, rich or poor, should at least have one or two good friends. my friends will listen to me when i want to speak, will wipe my eyes when i cry, will take care of me when i am sick, and my friends will go together with me side by side through this journey of life.
but in this fast-developing modern society, the reality is not that. more and more people forget to enjoy the beauty of friendship. they work hard in order to gain a higher position in the society and to earn more money for their work. they have few time to share with their friends. with the time goes by, they will be far away from each other.
friend is kind of treasure in our lives. it's actually like a bottle of wine, the longer it is kept, the sweeter it will be. it also likes a cup of hot tea, when we are in bed time, it will warm our broken hearts.
friends,especially best friends. it is what we should have in our lives,and it can make our lives be colorful go beyond our imagination.
thanks for your listening. this is what i concerned.
篇5：三分钟英语即兴演讲
thank you, mr. chairman.
mr. chairman, i join my colleague mr. rangel in thanking you for giving the junior members of this committee the glorious opportunity of sharing the pain of this inquiry. mr. chairman, you are a strong man, and it has not been easy but we have tried as best we can to give you as much assistance as possible.
earlier today, we heard the beginning of the preamble to the constitution of the united states: ”we, the people.“ it's a very eloquent beginning. but when that document was completed on the seventeenth of september in 1787, i was not included in that ”we, the people.“ i felt somehow for many years that george washington and alexander hamilton just left me out by mistake. but through the process of amendment, interpretation, and court decision, i have finally been included in ”we, the people.“
today i am an inquisitor. an hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that i feel right now. my faith in the constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. and i am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the constitution.
”who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?“ ”the subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men.“¹ and that's what we're talking about. in other words, [the jurisdiction comes] from the abuse or violation of some public trust.
it is wrong, i suggest, it is a misreading of the constitution for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that the president should be removed from office. the constitution doesn't say that. the powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon the encroachments of the executive. the division between the two branches of the legislature, the house and the senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge, the framers of this constitution were very astute. they did not make the accusers and the judgers -- and the judges the same person.
we know the nature of impeachment. we've been talking about it awhile now. it is chiefly designed for the president and his high ministers to somehow be called into account. it is designed to ”bridle“ the executive if he engages in excesses. ”it is designed as a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men.“² the framers confided in the congress the power if need be, to remove the president in order to strike a delicate balance between a president swollen with power and grown tyrannical, and preservation of the independence of the executive.
the nature of impeachment: a narrowly channeled exception to the separation-of-powers maxim. the federal convention of 1787 said that. it limited impeachment to high crimes and misdemeanors and discounted and opposed the term ”maladministration.“ ”it is to be used only for great misdemeanors,“ so it was said in the north carolina ratification convention. and in the virginia ratification convention: ”we do not trust our liberty to a particular branch. we need one branch to check the other.“
”no one need be afraid“ -- the north carolina ratification convention -- ”no one need be afraid that officers who commit oppression will pass with immunity.“ ”prosecutions of impeachments will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community,“ said hamilton in the federalist papers, number 65. ”we divide into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused.“³ i do not mean political parties in that sense.
the drawing of political lines goes to the motivation behind impeachment; but impeachment must proceed within the confines of the constitutional term ”high crime[s] and misdemeanors.“ of the impeachment process, it was woodrow wilson who said that ”nothing short of the grossest offenses against the plain law of the land will suffice to give them speed and effectiveness. indignation so great as to overgrow party interest may secure a conviction; but nothing else can.“
common sense would be revolted if we engaged upon this process for petty reasons. congress has a lot to do: appropriations, tax reform, health insurance, campaign finance reform, housing, environmental protection, energy sufficiency, mass transportation. pettiness cannot be allowed to stand in the face of such overwhelming problems. so today we are not being petty. we are trying to be big, because the task we have before us is a big one.
this morning, in a discussion of the evidence, we were told that the evidence which purports to support the allegations of misuse of the cia by the president is thin. we're told that that evidence is insufficient. what that recital of the evidence this morning did not include is what the president did know on june the 23rd, 1972.
the president did know that it was republican money, that it was money from the committee for the re-election of the president, which was found in the possession of one of the burglars arrested on june the 17th. what the president did know on the 23rd of june was the prior activities of e. howard hunt, which included his participation in the break-in of daniel ellsberg's psychiatrist, which included howard hunt's participation in the dita beard itt affair, which included howard hunt's fabrication of cables designed to discredit the kennedy administration.
we were further cautioned today that perhaps these proceedings ought to be delayed because certainly there would be new evidence forthcoming from the president of the united states. there has not even been an obfuscated indication that this committee would receive any additional materials from the president. the committee subpoena is outstanding, and if the president wants to supply that material, the committee sits here. the fact is that on yesterday, the american people waited with great anxiety for eight hours, not knowing whether their president would obey an order of the supreme court of the united states.
at this point, i would like to juxtapose a few of the impeachment criteria with some of the actions the president has engaged in. impeachment criteria: james madison, from the virginia ratification convention. ”if the president be connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter him, he may be impeached.“
we have heard time and time again that the evidence reflects the payment to defendants money. the president had knowledge that these funds were being paid and these were funds collected for the 1972 presidential campaign. we know that the president met with mr. henry petersen 27 times to discuss matters related to watergate, and immediately thereafter met with the very persons who were implicated in the information mr. petersen was receiving. the words are: ”if the president is connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter that person, he may be impeached.“
justice story: ”impeachment“ is attended -- ”is intended for occasional and extraordinary cases where a superior power acting for the whole people is put into operation to protect their rights and rescue their liberties from violations.“ we know about the huston plan. we know about the break-in of the psychiatrist's office. we know that there was absolute complete direction on september 3rd when the president indicated that a surreptitious entry had been made in dr. fielding's office, after having met with mr. ehrlichman and mr. young. ”protect their rights.“ ”rescue their liberties from violation.“
the carolina ratification convention impeachment criteria: those are impeachable ”who behave amiss or betray their public trust.“4 beginning shortly after the watergate break-in and continuing to the present time, the president has engaged in a series of public statements and actions designed to thwart the lawful investigation by government prosecutors. moreover, the president has made public announcements and assertions bearing on the watergate case, which the evidence will show he knew to be false. these assertions, false assertions, impeachable, those who misbehave. those who ”behave amiss or betray the public trust.“
james madison again at the constitutional convention: ”a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution.“ the constitution charges the president with the task of taking care that the laws be faithfully executed, and yet the president has counseled his aides to commit perjury, willfully disregard the secrecy of grand jury proceedings, conceal surreptitious entry, attempt to compromise a federal judge, while publicly displaying his cooperation with the processes of criminal justice. ”a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution.\"
if the impeachment provision in the constitution of the united states will not reach the offenses charged here, then perhaps that 18th-century constitution should be abandoned to a 20th-century paper shredder.
has the president committed offenses, and planned, and directed, and acquiesced in a course of conduct which the constitution will not tolerate? that's the question. we know that. we know the question. we should now forthwith proceed to answer the question. it is reason, and not passion, which must guide our deliberations, guide our debate, and guide our decision.
i yield back the balance of my time, mr. Chairman.
